HEY THIS IS IMPORTANT whats your favorite place to find drawing references?
so far we’ve got
senshi stock
croquis cafe
line-of-action.com
quickposes.com
posemaniacs
clip studio paint models
pexels.com
sketchdaily
eggazyoutatsu atarichan drawer
designdoll
if you have any more please reply!
Unsplash: All photos published on Unsplash can be used for free. You can use them for commercial and noncommercial purposes. You do not need to ask permission from or provide credit to the photographer or Unsplash, although it is appreciated when possible. More precisely, Unsplash grants you an irrevocable, nonexclusive copyright license to download, copy, modify, distribute, perform, and use photos from Unsplash for free, including for commercial purposes, without permission from or attributing the photographer or Unsplash. This license does not include the right to compile photos from Unsplash to replicate a similar or competing service.
Freeimages: You can use the images in digital format on websites, blog posts, social media, advertisements, film and television productions, web and mobile applications. In printed materials such as magazines, newspapers, books, brochures, flyers, product packaging for decorative use in your home, office or any public place or personal use. The rights granted to you by FreeImages.com are: Perpetual, meaning there is no expiration or end date on your rights to use the content. Non-exclusive, meaning that you do not have exclusive rights to use the content. FreeImages.com can license the same content to other customers. Unlimited, meaning you can use the content in an unlimited number of projects and in any media. For purposes of this agreement, “use” means to copy, reproduce, modify, edit, synchronize, perform, display, broadcast, publish, or otherwise make use of.
Stocksnap: Every single image on StockSnap are governed exclusively by the generous terms of the Creative Commons CC0 license. Specifically, that license means you can do any and all of the following: Download the image file.Publish, revise, copy, alter, and share that image. Use the image (as-is or as you’ve altered it), in both personal and commercial contexts. Moreover, you can put StockSnap CC0 images to any of these usages without buying the right to do it, acquiring written permission from the image’s creator, or attributing the work to the image creator. In other words, there’s no fee to download or use these StockSnap images in accordance with the CC0 license. They’re free to download, free to edit, and free to use – even in a commercial project! You don’t even need to attribute the image to the creator, the way you do with other CC or traditional copyright licensing schemes. (However, even though it’s not required, we here at StockSnap do encourage you to include an appropriate attribution. It’s a nice thing to do.)
Burst.Shopify: Burst is a free stock photo platform that is powered by Shopify. Their image library includes thousands of high-resolution, royalty-free images that were shot by their global community of photographers. You can use their pictures for just about anything — your website, blog or online store, school projects, Instagram ads, facebook posts, desktop backgrounds, client work and more. All of their photos are free for commercial use with no attribution required.
Pixabay: Images and Videos on Pixabay are released under Creative Commons CC0. To the extent possible under law, uploaders of Pixabay have waived their copyright and related or neighboring rights to these Images and Videos. You are free to adapt and use them for commercial purposes without attributing the original author or source. Although not required, a link back to Pixabay is appreciated.
Viintage: All images hosted by Viintage.com are considered to be public domain images, each image is presumed to be in the public domain. It may be distributed or copied as permitted by applicable law. Viintage.com assumes no ownership of the images and they may be downloaded and can be used free of charge for any purpose. They may be downloaded and used for commercial and personal use. Understand “public domain” as the permission to freely use an image without asking permission from the photographer or the illustrator. Thus, the creator of the work will not sue you for violating his/her copyrights. It is your responsibility to make sure, displaying the image does not violate any other law. Viintage.com assumes no responsibility for how or where you use the images found on the site.
Gratisography: You may use Gratisography pictures as you please for both personal and commercial projects. You can adapt and modify the images and get paid for work that incorporates the pictures. This includes advertising campaigns, adding your logo or text to an image, printed in any size print runs (e.g., book covers, magazines, posters, etc.), on your website, blog, or other digital mediums, and on merchandise as long as the picture itself is not the merchandise.
“Ludwig van Beethoven was of African descent, and the truth of his ethnic origins was covered up through a mixture of white powder worn on his face when out in public, the use of body doubles for portraits, and “euro-centric” historians, hiding the truth of his genetic heritage.“ – src
Remember in like 2013 it came out that Samsung smart TVs were revealed to be “always listening” and the data collected being sent to Samsung and it was an entire whole scandal about home privacy and the unethical collection and sale of marketing information.
Then the very next year the Amazon Alexa comes out and its practically sold as Your Friend The Data Collection Device, but its ok because this one has a soft human voice and is literally designed to be anthropomorphised. Who could stay mad at Alexa? “She” even has a people name!
where! has! my! passion! gone! I had it abundantly when I was a child, and I must have dropped it along the way, but I cannot figure where!
oh hey folks fun update, i found my passion again? i just had to find my right outlet, get to a place where I have aspirations, dispel apathy and pursue what I love, it’s all good and swell!
Hey guys ! We’re doing something a little different this month
because instead of separating analysis and opinion (well, as much as I can) I’m
doing a single piece about this month’s issue. Those of you who’ve followed me
for a while probably know why, but I simply didn’t feel confident I could do an
“objective” analysis of the elements of the issue while having such strong
feelings about it. So anyway, thoughts and spoilers under the cut.And just a reminder, if you’d like to help me not be broke, you can make a small donation here.
So as someone else who’s dealt with this (surprise, I was Baphomet here), I agree with most of this analysis but not all of it? I think some of these beats were handled poorly, but I had zero issues with how it ended.
So I’m gonna rehash a thing that happened to me in the past. CW abuse.
The first time I drank away from home was with my high school ex. We were both 17 and a box of Franzia in and it was New Year’s Eve and she hit me. Several times. Every time, I’d tell her to stop and try to walk away, and then she’d say she loved me, call me back, and, like a drunk teenager I’d come back, and then she’d giggle and hit me again. For the longest time I excused it as just us being dumb kids, but I think I’m only now realizing how fucked up it all was?
Anyway, to me, Morrigan has always been that moment. I hate you, no wait I love you, come back so I can hate you some more, isn’t this a fun game we’re playing?
Badb is the hating, Annie is the thing-that-is-called-loving-that-isn’t, and the Macha is that third part, the part that thinks it’s all a joke (haha, you don’t REALLY think I’m abusive, do you? It’s not like I [INSERT ACTION HERE]).
I have no issue with the fact that Morrigan apparently always thought this was a game, and I don’t necessarily agree with Pom’s take here (at least as it applies to my life). I think that, if someone views a relationship as a place to exert power over another, “gamelike” thinking is an entirely accurate descriptor. I don’t think she thought, or cared, that she was causing harm, because in her mind, she and Baphomet were playing a game together. Baphomet never thought it was a game, of course, but Morrigan always did, and used that fact to take pleasure in abuse and minimize whatever doubts she may have had about it along the way.
I agree with Pom’s take re: pacing. We spent so long away from the goths, only to return as if nothing has happened. If you’re not going to devote space to exploring the long downslide that lead to this issue, at least heavily imply what went down in the interim. I can’t imagine spending that long in the dark is good for either of their psyches.
I think to me, the end of this issue was two things, and though I felt catharsis from it I wish the intended message was a little clearer here. On the one hand, it’s possible that Morrigan, in that moment, genuinely realized that yes, she was an abuser, and attempted to undo what she’d done the only way she knew how (which, I think, is a common fantasy of someone on the receiving end of abuse: your partner heroically admitting they’re wrong and that they fully intended to care for you all along). On the other hand, it’s entirely possible that Morrigan wanted to play the martyr, and this, I think, is the more sinister & cynical take on it: resurrecting Baph was in its own way an act of abuse. By doing this, all of her gaslighting takes on a new weight- she sacrificed herself for him, after all, so she can’t have been wrong about him, right? She leaves him second-guessing forever, robs him of the satisfaction of ending things on his terms, and she gets to go out like she’s always wanted, in a blaze of bloody crows at midnight in a train station. I think the answer is a little of both of these.
In sum, I liked this issue a lot, and it was true to my experience, but I can absolutely see how others wouldn’t feel the same way.
Thanks for your analysis as usual, @pomegranate-salad ; I look forward to your Seeds of Thought almost as much as I look forward to the actual WicDiv issue releases.
Another excellent take on the issue. I did also consider sacrificing herself as an ultimate act of abuse (as it also applies to my experience), since it’s very common after all for abusers to threaten to commit suicide in order to control their victim by using their guilt. But i really think this meaning should have be a lot clearer if it was intended. As @garrodactyl said, this still comes off as victory for Baphomet, which i think is not where the storyline was heading.
Thank you for your addition (and sharing a personal story), i think it matters to have several voices on this issue.
Yeah I kinda wanna chime in on this, I agree with a lot of Pom’s take but I’ve also viewed an abusive relationship develop over time. My mom remarried and for a long time my stepdad was emotionally abusive, he’d shout and throw tantrums at any kind of small argument–”clean up your stuff” became a screaming match, followed by screeching tires. As my bio dad abandoned me, this was pretty psychologically hurtful to everyone. However as time passed my mom’s depression got much worse, she started drinking, and became emotionally abusive as well. This isn’t every case of abuse but I see Morrigan/Baph as being dysfunctional in the beginning, and becomes more abusive the longer they’re gods and the more imperial the gods become. These are two people that should’ve just broken up and stayed that way, or could maybe change if godhood weren’t in the way. I think the sequence of Morrigan turning into a literal bird and clawing at her face is to show that like Amaterasu or Sakhmet, godhood makes people act in ways they normally wouldn’t and enhances their worst traits. Not that this excuses their behavior, but I can’t see characters behaving this way if they weren’t gods. I’ve seen normal people become abusers not out of malice or intent but their own problems. This isn’t an excuse for behavior but not all abusers are intentionally malicious. A lot of them are totally convinced they are 100% right, feel justified in lashing out and hurting others because of their own pain. My mom, for example, would frequently scream that all her problems were because she had me. Later she’d tell me she didn’t remember even saying that. I’m still working through it–in vino veritas is a saying that’s hard to combat, especially when your mother slurs it at you in defense–so my judgement is clouded by this perspective, as is anyone’s. Unlike Amaterasu or Woden, who are used to communicate a general message about white women/white men and privilege; I think Morrigan/Baph’s situation is specific to them. I don’t see Baph living as a “victory” at all, I didn’t feel super happy at the end of the issue or like he’d triumphed. I’m glad he’s alive but this isn’t the same “woo hoo!” victory feeling I had after, say, some action beats in Rising Action. It’s just a big, fucked up situation. Ultimately I think everyone involved or reacting to abusive relationships has a different take and will react to this storyline differently, and I don’t think any responses are bad or wrong. IMO I thought this issue was great, I thought the flashbacks/fightscene was fine and not too ham-fisted. I read it as Baph thinking about this stuff as he’s fighting. I also really liked the effectiveness of the pages and pages of black panels. If the reader is annoyed at the wasted space, I think that’s kind of the point, as it makes you feel something close to what Minervananke is feeling. In that case I think it’s kind of great. I dunno, there’s something about this issue–Morrigan’s creepy claw-arm, her disturbing victory smile, the bird face, the Badb reaction shot–that I keep thinking about over and over. Again though this is just my opinion based on my personal experience and what I’ve seen, I want to add that obviously not every abusive relationship or abuser is the same as what I’ve experienced, and I don’t want to devalue anyone else’s experience or be dismissive.